Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare |
Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare |
![]() |
It Doesn't Make Sense "Nothing in biology makes
sense except in the light of evolution. " -- Theodosius Dobzhanski
This
quote has been repeated so often that it is generally accepted at face
value without question. It appears on the Saint Louis University
Department of Biology web page and a faculty web page at the Alabama
School of Mathematics and Science.
Removing
the double negative, it says, "Everything in biology makes sense only
in the light of evolution. " If everything in biology is the result of
evolution, then everything in biology should make sense in light of
evolution. But many modern biological observations don't make sense in
light of the nineteenth-century theory of evolution. .
Let's look at some examples.
Here
in the Mojave Desert we are all too familiar with the sidewinder
rattlesnake. The sidewinder doesn't make sense in light of evolution.
How could a snake evolve an organ that manufactures and stores toxic
substances in its own body without killing itself? How likely is it
that the toxic chemical storage facility would accidentally become
connected to hollow fangs? Is there some plausible explanation for how
the action of biting would naturally cause the venom to squirt out the
fangs? How is it that the poison that kills the rat doesn't kill the
snake that eats the poisoned rat?
Here
in the Mojave Desert we are also familiar with the AIM-9 Sidewinder
air-to-air missile. (It was designed here at China Lake. ) How did an
infrared seeker get connected to an autopilot which is connected to
steering fins on a tube containing a rocket motor and high explosives
attached to a triggering mechanism? Clearly, those things were
consciously assembled to create something that destroys airplanes. It
is just as clear that the venom delivery system in a sidewinder
rattlesnake is a weapon system that is the result of planning and
execution, not accident and selection.
It
doesn't make sense that poison would evolve in snakes. Nor does it make
sense that similar chemical warfare systems would evolve in jellyfish,
frogs, insects, and plants.
Consider
the life-cycle of a monarch butterfly. 1 The monarch butterfly egg
hatches into a caterpillar. The caterpillar eats leaves and grows until
such time as it gets the irresistible urge to hang, upside-down,
helpless for about 12 hours, while its body undergoes some internal
changes. Then, it starts wiggling, and the caterpillar's skin breaks
just behind the head. As it wiggles, the head, skin, and legs fall off,
leaving just a capsule-shaped chrysalis. This chrysalis hangs there
helpless for a week or two. During this time, its innards dissolve into
a jelly-like substance that is comparable to the yolk and white of an
egg. Just as the yolk and white of an egg congeal somehow into a
chicken, the goo inside the chrysalis congeals into a butterfly.
Finally, the chrysalis breaks, a butterfly wiggles out, and migrates
3,000 miles.
How
does this make sense in light of evolution? What is the survival
advantage of hanging helpless for a week or two? What series of genetic
accidents could have caused this to happen? Why must a butterfly become
an egg a second time and be born again?
One
could argue that this makes sense in a world view that teaches that
nature is full of spiritual object lessons; but it doesn't make sense
in a world view that teaches everything happens by chance, and the most
advantageous processes survive while less efficient ones go extinct.
There are lots of other
things that don't make sense in light of evolution. We wrote about a
few of them last September in the Stone
Age Mutant Mammal Turtles essay. Breasts, pouches, and udders
don't make sense. Radical changes in respiratory and circulatory
systems don't make sense.
We
are sure that if you think about it for a little while, you could come
up with your own long list of things that don't make sense in light of
evolution.
We
admit that there are a few things that do make sense in light of
evolution. Selfishness, murder, rape, deceit, cannibalism, and racism,
come immediately to mind. If evolution were true, these traits would
help in the battle for survival, and would eventually manifest
themselves in the surviving species. But just because people murder and
commit rape doesn't prove that evolution is true. There could be
another explanation for this behavior.
Don't
just accept the party line. Get into the habit of asking yourself,
"Does this biological observation make sense in light of evolution?" In
most cases we believe that you will find that it doesn't. Scientists
are wasting their time trying to make sense of something that will
never make sense. Even in those cases where scientists come up with a
somewhat plausible explanation for how something that didn't happen
happened, that explanation will be wrong. Wrong explanations are
worthless, no matter how plausible they seem.
Footnotes:
|
![]() SUBTITLES
![]() ![]() |