A state should just be the mechanism by which a race helps itself, in the same manner that a family helps itself.
That's the true meaning of National Socialism.
That's what we need in America today.
What is National
Socialism?
by Dale Peterson
Introduction
This essay will attempt to give a broad understanding of what National Socialism is. It is written for the uninformed but curious average citizen, but I suspect it will be of interest as well to many who already find themselves with racist/racialist beliefs. National Socialism is more than just racism. National Socialism is biology put into practice on a National societal level, whereas racism is simply the common-sense application of evolutionary inequality to humans. Rather than a FAQ on National Socialism, this will hopefully answer in reasonable depth what National Socialism is, for I am asked "what is National Socialism" far more than I am questioned on the principles of National Socialism.
To allow one to reconcile the differences between National Socialism and the other political systems out there, one fact must be established beforehand, and that is that National Socialism is not simply a political system or a form of government, but a general philosophy, a Weltanschauung (German word of which the best translation probably is "world-view" or "world-philosophy").
It offers an insight into many spheres; political, philosophical, biological, and economic being the four major ones, and therefore those I will explain here. But one must remember that National Socialism is a Weltanschauung at heart, whereas Democracy is simply a governmental system.
One must also realize that man is neither hermit nor herd animal, but a little of both, because these traits are not mutually exclusive. He has individualistic traits, but he also has socialistic traits. He is both himself and part of a group. Only National Socialism recognizes this fact, whereas the capitalists would like us to believe that we are only individuals, and the communists are telling us we are only part of a greater collective. We must recognize that individuality must be limited at the point where it is a detriment to the social good, and that collectivism must be limited where it begins to destroy the soul of the individual.
POLITICAL NATIONAL SOCIALISM
National Socialism is best viewed as the family structure applied to government.
The family is connected by blood, by soil, and by love.
Similarly, a National Socialist state is connected by blood (race), by soil (territory), and by love (comradeship, patriotism). Comparing the National Socialist
Folkish state with a family is a very basic way of looking at the way National Socialism is run politically. Like a family, the National Socialist state is only the vessel and the race is what it contains. The vessel can have a value only if it preserves and safeguards the contents. The value of one is inferior to the value of the whole, and, if need be, the lesser must be sacrificed to protect the greater. In a National Socialist state, one has rights and a proportionate amount of responsibilities. He has freedom and liberty to do what he will, as long as it is not at the detriment of anyone else or the racial nation itself.
Elections
There are no popular elections in a National Socialist state, just as there are none in a family. Elections rarely produce a strong leader, rather, they produce politicians, and the very politicians who are most adept at lying and
deceiving the populace are the ones who usually win. In a democratic system, the votes of two idiots count for more than that of one well-informed man. In a National Socialist system will, character, and ability are the three main tenets of leadership, and leaders are appointed to office by their superiors rather than elected.
By way of this appointment, the leaders of a National Socialist state have absolute power to make decisions over their particular field. Some say that absolute power corrupts absolutely, but society must front up to three facts before being so hasty to throw this type of catch phrase around.
First - Power must be given to somebody, else there is no more than anarchy.
Second - It is essential to have responsibility for power, lest it be misused. Where one man is making the decisions, he alone is responsible for the outcome of those decisions. Where votes are taken in a parliament or senate, responsibility is so divided that effectively no one is held accountable.
Third - Given power's tendency to corrupt, it makes more sense to entrust it to him who shows the best character, and is consequently more able to resist its corrupting influence.
If two men stand together, and one is to have power over the other, it is natural that it should be the better man, the man with the stronger will, the better character, and the superior ability, that rules over his companion. This is the formula that has always stood throughout Man's history, and is in fact the very basis of any structured and hierarchal society outside of human society.
It is the strongest and most dominant lion who leads the pride -- he is the one who is the most likely to make the best decisions most of the time. If he becomes unsuitable for his position at the top, whether it be because he becomes too foolish or too old, there is always a younger and smarter lion waiting in the wings to take his place. The same is true in the National Socialist
Folkish state.
Responsibilities
Under the democratic systems, responsibility is split up among numerous individuals, and ultimately lies with the general public that elects the electors. This leads to the undesirable situation of the electors or representatives having little to no responsibility for the way in which they use (or misuse) their power. The very worst that could happen is that they manage to fall out of favor with their electorate come the next elections, and lose their seat in office. We can see, through the various hucksters and showboat politicians we have had leading our nations, that this is little
deterrent to wildly abusing political power.
In the National Socialist system however, ultimate responsibility lies in one man, the leader (Fuhrer), to make ultimate decisions. Should those decisions turn out to be made in error, then he must accept
responsibility for those errors and hand over his power to a more capable person.
Other leaders, subordinate to the Führer, have dual responsibilities, not only to their decisions, but to carrying out the decisions of their superiors. Should these duties be carried out to the satisfaction of their superiors, they are rewarded with more power; should they not, then their power is reduced or they are deposed.
Rights
Rights are not given to the individual by some spook in the sky. For one to give rights he must have a way of enforcing them, and an imaginary spirit in the sky can not and does not. Rights are granted by the more powerful to the less
powerful, and they come with responsibilities. If the rights-granters and enforcers are corrupt or
tyrannical, then the inferior must earn the right to become granters and enforcers themselves by
demonstrating their superior character through revolution.
Under National Socialism rights are directly proportionate to one's responsibility to the
Folkish state. There are people (subjects) who have very little responsibility, and consequently have very few rights. There are others (citizens) who have a normal
responsibility and enjoy the same rights as most everyone else. And there are those (leaders) who bear the burden of tremendous responsibility and have not only personal rights, but guarantee the rights of others (in other words, they hold political
power).
Structure
The structure of a National Socialist government is, as I said, like that of a family.
It is ruled from the top down, in a pyramid fashion, rather than the other way around, as the democracies. Every leader has council and advisors, but that council is there to advise that particular leader on a certain things, not to make decisions. The advice travels upward, the decisions travel downward. Committees may be held, but again, the purpose of these bodies is to advise those making the decisions, rather than to make the decisions themselves.
Democracy, at its heart, is mob rule. Whoever is in favor with the mob is "right," and whoever is not is "wrong." A small minority may actually be right about something yet drowned out by the large majority and the many voices of their misinformed argument. With the advent of mass media this tendency is
strengthened, as the folks behind the amplifiers can more or less create "public
opinion."
Indeed, so strong are the mass media that public opinion can be shaped
and manipulated in such a way that the majority of people, never well informed
ever, are firmly convinced they're in the driver's seat by the media-masters who
really do exert the control.
At the end of the day you have a society governed by the will of the masses, yes, but a will manipulated-created by the media moguls (who tend to be Jewish). Under this democratic mob rule, with it's glorification of the dunce's opinion, a mob mentality quickly predominates, and its effects are vastly compounded by the media. The mob mentality by its very nature is an attempt to bring everyone into one line of thinking, with people trying to approximate the mean, and therefore become part of the majority.
True aristocrats learn to dress, behave -- live -- down in an attempt to be men of the people. In a society where the majority is always right, who wants to be in the minority, which is by definition wrong? The standard that determines elections comes to determine quality -- and everything else. Racial and social destruction ensue, benefiting only the Jews of the mass media, operating behind the scenes like the man behind the screen in
"Wizard of Oz."
National Socialism, by contrast, offers open Aryan control in place of hidden Jewish manipulation. There is virtually no way a foreign interest (such as the Jews are, and always have been, to Aryans) can secure public opinion via the mass media, primarily because the media is strictly regulated by the government, and secondly because the opinions of the majority public matter little in a National Socialist state. This makes National Socialism a
comparatively stable political system, and one relatively unaffected by foreign subversion. National Socialism is governed from the top down, whereas Democracy (mob rule) rules -- pretends to rule -- from the bottom up. Humans are always and everywhere ruled by a minority elite; the real question is in whose actual interests that elite operates, not whose name.
ECONOMIC NATIONAL SOCIALISM
Many Reactionaries make the error of closely comparing National Socialism to Communism in terms of economical policy, when in fact the two stand wide apart from each other. It is also interesting to note that the Communists claim National Socialism is not socialism at all, and is in fact the purest form of Capitalism. In reality, however, National Socialism is neither Capitalism nor Communism, but takes natural and healthy elements from each one to form a more "centrist" style of government. Neither laissez-faire Capitalism nor
Bolshevik Communism have ever worked in practice, and neither of them will work because they are both two sides of the same coin. What we need, rather than one unhealthy extreme or the other, is a healthy median, a balance, between the two. The National Socialist state allows capitalistic principles, but not at the expense of the collective folk.
Economic individualism
In a National Socialist society, unlike Communism, there is certainly private ownership of property and land, and there is private ownership of possessions and capital. But unlike Capitalism, though, financial interests are curtailed and restricted at the point where they begin to have a negative effect on the
Folkish state. One example of this might be the charging of usurious interest rates on loans, which binds the working class into the slavery of an endless debt/interest cycle. Interest rates for the public should never be raised past a fraction of a percent, and this should be set in place by the central nationalized bank (Reichsbank) and this rate controlled by the Minister of Finance through the President of the Reichsbank. The charging of interest on loans by any other organization or business or individual is strictly forbidden, for that is the acquisition of income for those not employed or making no effort which is also forbidden.
Usury forbidden
That last statement might come as a shock to some of you, namely; that the
gaining of income without work should be forbidden. Allow me to explain.
When an individual is gaining wealth through means whereby he is not contributing an equal amount of effort in exchange, it means that somewhere along the way someone is making more effort than he should in order to feed and clothe and house this individual who is contributing nothing himself. That should be considered nothing short of slavery by any civilized society, and that's exactly what usury is. Money or wealth by its very nature does not replicate itself.
If Paul keeps a dollar bill for a hundred years, at the end of that time he still has a dollar bill, it is worth no more than it was a century earlier. If he lends that dollar bill to Josef and Josef agrees to pay Paul a dollar-fifty at the end of that hundred years, then effectively, all Paul's done is manage to exploit Josef at a time of need, for his own profit.
Say that your brother was starving, would you force him to work like a slave for you before you gave him a meal? Certainly no civilized man would do such a thing to his own brother. One must certainly wonder why the so-called civilized men of the world today would think nothing of doing the same to his fellow racial countryman in the form of usury. This is not an Aryan trait, rather a Jewish one. Jews are predominantly behind the usurious practices in our society with absolutely criminal 25% interest rates and the like. Slavery and exploitation are not what racial comrades do to one another, and that is why in the
Folkish state this usurious slavery is forbidden.
Labor unions nationalized
To promote better understanding between workers and employers, all labor unions are nationalized into one monolithic body, which in Germany was known as the Deutsche Arbeitsfront (DAF). This organization is headed by one individual known as the Arbeitsfuhrer (Work Leader) who is, in turn, responsible to the Führer. Any conflicts or disputes that do arise between employers and workers are resolved through mediation between representatives of the DAF and the employer, by an organization set up for that purpose.
This organization shall take the form of a commission consisting in an equal proportion of representatives of various industries and representatives from the "DAF" who are representative of the workers of various said industries, and chaired by a representative of the Economics Ministry. This organization shall have power to appoint a mediator or make recommendations and suggestions to the representative of the Economics Ministry who alone has the power to force a solution.
It is worthy of note that there was not one strike in any of the twelve years this system was active under Adolf Hitler.
Value of currency
The value of currency in a National Socialist state shall be directly tied to the productive capacity of the racial
Folkish state. It shall not be backed with the capital of the people (as the American Dollar is), nor of the capital of the state (i.e. gold standard, silver standard) but rather be guaranteed by the productivity of the
Folkish state.
Fractional reserve banking is a fraud perpetrated on the nations of this world by the Jew. The system a National Socialist state takes for its currency is that every unit of money is worth a specific amount of WORK rather than gold, silver, land, or property. Therefore it is the duty of the Economics Minister to recognize the total value of the productivity of the National Socialist state and the duty of the President of the "Reichsbank" to set the value of currency at an appropriate level to match this value.
PHILOSOPHICAL NATIONAL SOCIALISM
Most every other philosophy, political notion, or religious belief stems from the absurd notion that human beings are somehow above Nature, that for some strange reason, biological laws just don't apply to humans.
National Socialism is the only one that accepts the concrete fact that humans are indeed part of Nature also.
It is National Socialism that is the ideology of Nature -- the living of one's life based on Natural principles.
One can choose to live in a material fashion, pursuing wealth, short-term gratification, fornication, or other "feel good" goals. Or one can choose to live in a way that reflects accordance with Nature, in pursuit of an idealistic goal which may not be achieved for centuries, patiently waiting for love over simple fornication, and replacing the Jewish notion that money is king with the Aryan one that excellence is king.
There is more to life than material wealth.
National Socialists hold the premise that it is better for a society to be motivated toward a higher goal than simply "feeling good" in the present, and that in fact pursuing this short-term goal society is left worse off, just as the individual ends up feeling sorry for himself in the long term.
The basis for this "feel good" mentality is rather childish. A child does not plan for the future, he wants his gratification NOW, and that is all that matters to him. The Negro's general mentality runs along the same lines. We have had our mature, logical tendency toward forethought and preparedness Niggerized by the Jew into this infantile "me want feel good now" line of thinking.
Quality and quantity
National Socialism is an ideology of quality over quantity. National Socialists would rather have a better society than a large one; we would rather have fewer, better people than a great number of mediocre people.
We want a society that encourages White families, not black. Whites invest great amounts of energy and time in the development of their children, whereas the blacks they are forced by the Jewish system to subsidize invest little beyond the reproductive gametes. This will be covered in more detail later on, when I write of the biological principles underlying National Socialism.
The individual and the collective
National Socialism recognizes the fact that men are born neither isolated individuals nor members of an ant colony.
We are born into the world as both an individual will and spirit and part of a family, the basic unity of society. We are also born into a race, which is merely an extension of the family -- a larger family of distant relatives with whom we share a common genetic bond. It is only sensible to recognize both of these realms rather than ignore one (as collectivist communism does) or the other (as individualist capitalism does).
Equality and inequality
I cover biological differences later on, but I am more concerned with the philosophical argument here.
One recurring argument of the egalitarians is that "we are all human," "we are all self-conscious," "we all bleed," and therefore we are all the same. The same might be said of numerous animals, though. Degrees of difference are all-important, and we see the fact reflected around us everywhere.
Morals
Morals are nothing but opinion, usually mass opinion, codified into a set of doctrines that are at their root, completely arbitrary. There is no universal morality. Opinions are neither right nor wrong, just facts, because only facts can be demonstrated so.
One man's morality might be different from mine, and both may differ from Bob's next door. A hundred years ago homosexuality was immoral, but today the majority of the populace believes it's perfectly moral (this however, does not mean it's not unnatural and unhealthy). General morals can change over time, they are very fluid and plastic and can be influenced by factors.
This is why I laugh when people tell me that the wholesale extermination of the Jews known as the 'Holocaust' is "wrong" because it's "immoral." Since morals are opinions, what they are in fact saying is "its wrong because I think it's wrong," which is ridiculous. In all honesty I think the Jews got exactly what they deserved in the 'Holocaust.' My view on this might be considered immoral to some, but to me it's perfectly moral. That is the ultimate justification of the argument that morals are opinions and nothing else. If they were absolutes, how could one have a contrary set of morals to another?
Whose superiority?
In the natural world, the strong dominate the weak. The higher evolved forms dominate and subjugate the lower evolved forms. In nature, might is the only right and extinction is the punishment for weakness.
This is true for humans when one looks at the way the higher races have dominated the lower for the last few millennia. There is nothing "wrong" with dominating those of an inferior kind; those who are not strong enough to preserve their independence are either absorbed or crushed.
What one will usually hear in response to this argument is that since the Aryan race is in such a docile state at the moment, and since the majority of our kind are at the beck and call of the Jew, there is also nothing "wrong" with this, as we couldn't have been subjugated if we were the superior breed.
This is ABSOLUTELY TRUE. If the Aryan dies out it will be because he is NOT STRONG ENOUGH to dominate the Jewish parasite that caused his death. Ergo, the wheels of nature complete one more cycle, and the White man falls from the top of the tree as an extinct species.
But things at the moment all rely on that "if." I do not believe that we will be rendered extinct and I do not believe that the Jew is the superior breed to effect this biological revolution. I (along with the rest of the White Nationalist community) believe that we are the superior kind, and that we can overcome the Jewish grip on our society. If we do, then we prove our superiority, if we do not, then we are a race whose fate is already a foregone conclusion.
That is why it is up to us to fight, and fight hard, and resist the Jewish scuttling of our Aryan boat, because only through the success or failure of this resistance do we prove our superiority. If our biological boat sinks, it will be because we failed to kill the parasite that was eating away at our hull. And the punishment for that failure will be in accordance with natural law - extinction.
BIOLOGICAL NATIONAL SOCIALISM
National Socialism has its roots in nature; it is merely natural principles (rule of one, natural selection, race as family, etc.) applied to the political and the general philosophical realms. In that sense it is Natural Socialism, it is neither extreme individualism nor extreme collectivism, for neither of these are natural and both of them assume men to be above nature. It is biology taken to its logical political and social conclusions.
Simple biological principles
Why is it that with the evidence in front of the eyes of every biologist in the world, only a minute percentage has the sense to advocate putting these solid evolutionary biological principles into social application? That they have not done so shows me that their cowardice overrides their intelligence.
The races are not equal. They did not evolve equally because the environments in which they evolved were different. It should be common sense, therefore, to conclude that the races cannot be considered equal in any way, shape, or form. They are distinct biological branches of the human species.
The White man in the harsh climate of Alpine Europe needed a larger brain to survive there than did the lowly Negro roaming the African continent with a spear in his hand and a bone through his nose, and a large plate in his lip. The African climate is temperate, and game abounds. For those who can master simple hunter/gatherer skills, survival there is a breeze. Not so in Alpine Europe, where the harshness of the climate demands a different type of survival. It demands shelter from the cold. It demands ingenuity in hunting or trapping the comparatively little game. It demands foresight in saving food for the winter. It demands warm clothes.
Altogether, it demands a degree of inventiveness other locales do not. Should it not be therefore obvious that the White Aryan man would evolve in a way that suits this type of thinking-on-one's-feet lifestyle, while the Negro should evolve in a way that best allowed him to survive in the African heat?
Socio-reproductive trends
Certainly they should evolve differently. In fact, if we are to accept evolution and modern biology at all they MUST evolve differently.
One of the ways in which this difference is quite striking is in
theosocio-reproductive strategies of the races, and how they differ.
The lower races, typified by the Negro, have a socio-reproductive strategy that tends toward producing as many offspring as possible, paying little or no regard to the way in which said offspring are raised, or their intellectual aspects cultured. The Aryan by contrast focuses on raising and developing fewer but higher quality offspring: quality over quantity.
It is undoubtable that these trends played a role in forming the biological traits of the current races as we know them. Focusing more on breeding caused that aspect to be more pronounced in the Negro, whose children are born on average a week earlier than those of the Aryan and mature faster. Whereas focusing more on development caused the intellectual and creative traits to be enhanced in the Aryan. These traits were enhanced by their respective breeding strategies.
Of course, we cannot attribute all the racial differences to socio-reproductive behavior alone, as that itself is a racial trait, and the root of these always has and always will be Natural Selection. But we can observe that these same socio-reproductive trends that are an evolved behavior can themselves influence the evolutionary development of a race, magnifying the effects of Natural Selection and increasing the difference between races.
Branching of species
In all areas of Nature does one see the branching of species; first into different breeds, then sub-species, then wholly independent species. This is how species come into being, how they evolve, and how they adapt to different environments.
This branching is necessary both for the advancement of the species into a higher form, and for the protection of the species through biological diversity and resistance to threat.
Branching of the species occurs where a mutation causes a biological separation of one group from the greater species. This mutation and others like it eventually adapt a particular sub-species to a particular environment to which the greater species would not be otherwise suited, or at least not as suited as the new sub-species.
This is also how the differences between the races came about. White people evolved for the European environment, which forced them to become more intellectual and creative; the Oriental evolved for the Eastern environment in which he stayed at fairly the same level; and the Negro on the dark continent did virtually nothing but eat and breed, and consequently became rather adept at both these tasks.
Separation of the races
What we must remember is that a mixing of the Negro, or of any other race with our Aryan kind is UNNATURAL. It is unnatural because it runs contrary to the basic evolutionary principle of branching the species. In nature the White man and the Negro would be separated by vast amounts of land, far too much land for any serious mongrelization of either race to occur.
But by modern transportation technology these distances are crossed daily without second thought, and the races meet and fraternize with one another. It is the geographical mixing of races that leads to a biological mixing of races which again, would otherwise not have occurred.
And it is this mixing of races that runs contrary to the development and branching of species into races and into sub-species and at last into independent species themselves. Should the Aryan and the Negro, or any other race for that matter, stay apart and evolve independently long enough, there will come a stage where interbreeding is no longer possible.
But should we all mix into one planet of coffee-colored brillo-haired Mulattos, Sambos and Mestizos there will be no biological diversity, no branching of the species, and evolution will be set back some 200,000 years to a point where races again begin to form and the branching starts over again. Would it not be therefore more progressive to preserve this biological independence and continue evolution as it is, rather setting it back and retarding its eventual continuation?
CONCLUSION
As we can see, the National Socialist Weltanschauung is considerably more than a political system like Republicanism or Democracy, or even an ideological economic system like Communism or Capitalism. It is something more, something else.
It is not a religion or something that is expected to be taken on grounds of faith; the principles I have outlined here are solidly rooted in fact and logic. There are no spooks in the sky here, or utopian promises of universal equality. The very concept of National Socialism means simply a racial state -- an extension of the family, the folk, the people.
National Socialism is at its root, NATURAL socialism. It is the foundation for natural society, and it is nothing more than these natural -- biological -- premises put together into a cohesive and structured way of looking at the world. There are no references here, there are no abstracts one must rely on or comprehend before he can understand the principles of
National Socialism. One need only rely on logic and reason and biology to fully understand National Socialism and every justification of the principles that at its heart. National Socialism is nothing more than applied biology.
Mother Nature is a NAZI.
DALE PETERSON
25 POINTS OF
AMERICAN NATIONAL SOCIALISM
NSM88.COM
National Socialist Movement
P.O. Box 580669, Minneapolis, MN, 55458
(651) 659-6307
- We demand the union of all Whites into
a greater America on the basis of the right of national
self-determination.
- We demand equality of rights for the
American people in its dealings with other nations, and
the revocation of the United Nations, the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization, the World Bank, the North American
Free Trade Agreement, the World Trade Organization, and
the International Monetary Fund.
- We demand land and territory (colonies)
to feed our people and to settle surplus population.
- Only members of the nation may be
citizens of the state. Only those of pure White blood,
whatever their creed, may be members of the nation.
Non-citizens may live in America only as guests and must
be subject to laws for aliens. Accordingly, no Jew or
homosexual may be a member of the nation.
- The right to vote on the State
government and legislation shall be enjoyed by citizens
of the state alone.
We therefore demand that all official
appointments, of whatever kind, whether in the nation,
in the states or in smaller localities, shall be held by
none but citizens.
We oppose the corrupting parliamentary
custom of filling posts merely in accordance with party
considerations and special interests-without reference
to character or abilities.
- We demand that the State shall make it
its primary duty to provide a livelihood for its
citizens. If it should prove impossible to feed the
entire population, foreign nationals (non-citizens) will
be deported.
One can dream...
- All non-White immigration must be
prevented. We demand that all non-Whites currently
residing in America be required to leave the nation
forthwith and return to their land of origin: peacefully
or by force.
- All citizens shall have equal rights
and duties, regardless of class or station.
- It must be the first duty of every
citizen to perform physical or mental work. The
activities of the individual must not clash within the
framework of the community and be for the common good.
"We must have an all-White America; an America in which our children and our grandchildren will play and go to school with other White children; an America in which they will date and marry other young people of our own race; an America in which all their offspring will be beautiful, healthy White babies never
race-less mongrels. We must have an America without swarming black filth in our schools, on our buses and in our places of work; an America in which our cultural, social, business and political life is free of alien, Jewish influence; an America in which White people are the sole masters of our own destiny."
- George Lincoln Rockwell
We therefore demand:
"We must have an all-White America; an America in which our children and our grandchildren will play and go to school with other White children; an America in which they will date and marry other young people of our own race; an America in which all their offspring will be beautiful, healthy White babies never
race-less mongrels. We must have an America without swarming black filth in our schools, on our buses and in our places of work; an America in which our cultural, social, business and political life is free of alien, Jewish influence; an America in which White people are the sole masters of our own destiny."
-
Commander George Lincoln Rockwell
We therefore demand:
- The abolition of incomes unearned by
work The breaking of interest slavery.
- In view of the enormous personal
sacrifices of life and property demanded of a nation by
any war, personal enrichment from war must be regarded
as a crime against the nation. We therefore demand the
ruthless confiscation of all war profits.
- We demand the nationalization of all
businesses which have been formed into corporations
(trusts).
- We demand economic reform suitable to
our national requirements;
- The prohibition of pro-Marxist unions
and their sup plantation with National Socialist trade
unions;
- The passing of a law instituting
profit-sharing in large industrial enterprises;
- The creation of a livable wage;
- The restructuring of social security
and welfare to include drug testing for welfare
recipients;
- The immediate discontinuation of all
taxes on things of life's necessity, such as food,
clothing, shelter, medicine etc.:
- The replacement of the current tax
system with a flat-rate tax based on income.
- We demand the treasonable system of
health care be completely revolutionized.
- We demand an end to the status quo in
which people die or rot away from lack of proper
treatment due to the failure of their medical coverage,
Health Maintenance Organization, or insurance policy.
- We further demand the extensive
development of insurance for old age and that
prescription drugs be made both affordable and
accessible.
- We demand the creation and maintenance
of a healthy middle class, the immediate communalizing
of big department stores and their lease at a cheap rate
to small traders, and that the utmost consideration
shall be shown to all small trades in the placing of
state and municipal orders.
- We demand a land reform suitable to our
national requirements, that shall be twofold in nature:
» The primary land reform will be to
ensure all members of the nation receive affordable
housing. The party as such stands explicitly for private
property.
» However, we support the passing of a
law for the expropriation of land for communal purposes
without compensation when deemed necessary for land
illegally acquired, or not administered in accordance
with the national welfare.
» We further demand the abolition of
ground rent, the discontinuation of all taxes on
property, and the prohibition of all speculation in
land.
» The secondary land reform will be to
ensure the environmental integrity of the nation is
preserved;
» By setting aside land for national
wildlife refuges;
» By cleaning the urban, agricultural,
and hydrographical (water) areas of the nation;
» By creating legislation regulating the
amount of pollution, carbon dioxide, greenhouse gases ,
and toxins released into the atmosphere;
» And for the continued research and
development of clean burning fuels and energy sources.
- We demand the ruthless prosecution of
those whose activities are injurious to the common
interest. Murderers, rapists, pedophiles, drug dealers,
usurers, profiteers, race traitors, etc. must be
severely punished, whatever their creed or race.
- We demand that Roman edict law, which
serves a materialistic new world order, be replaced by
Anglo-Saxon common law.
- The state must consider a thorough
reconstruction of our national system of education with
the aim of opening up to every able and hardworking
American the possibility of higher education and of thus
obtaining advancement.
» The curricula of all educational
establishments must be brought into line with the
requirements of practical life.
» The aim of the school must be to give
the pupil, beginning with the first sign of
intelligence, a grasp of the state of the nation through
the study of civic affairs.
» We demand the education of gifted
children of poor parents, whatever their class or
occupation, at the expense of the state.
- The state must ensure that the nation's
health standards are raised by protecting mothers,
infants, and the unborn:
» By prohibiting abortion and
euthanasia, except in cases of rape, incest,
race-mixing, or mental retardation
» By prohibiting child labor and ending
the rudiments of child abuse, alcoholism, and drug
addiction.
» By creating conditions to make
possible the reestablishment of the nuclear family in
which the father works while the mother stays at home
and takes care of the children if they so choose.
» By taking away the economic burden
associated with childbirth and replacing it with a
structured system of pay raises for those that give
birth to healthy babies, thereby returning the blessing
associated with children.
» To further ensure that the nation's
health standards are raised, legislation shall be passed
promoting physical strength and providing for compulsory
gymnastics and sports, and by the extensive support of
clubs engaged in the physical training of youth.
- We demand the right to bear arms for
law-abiding citizens.
- We demand the abolition of the
mercenary army, the end to the over-use of our military
as a 'Meals-on-Wheels' program in foreign lands of no
vital interest to our nation; and the formation of a
true national service for the defense of our race and
nation. One that excludes: non-Americans, criminals, and
sensitivity training.
- We demand legal warfare on deliberate
political mendacity and its dissemination in the press.
To facilitate the creation of a national press we
demand:
(a) That all editors of and
contributors to newspapers appearing in the English
language must be members of the nation;
(b) That no non-American newspapers
may appear without the express permission of the State.
They must not be written in the English language;
(c) That non-Whites shall be
prohibited by law from participating financially in or
influencing American newspapers, and that the penalty
for contravening such a law shall be the suppression of
any such newspapers, and the immediate deportation of
the non-Americans involved.
» The publishing of papers which are not
conducive to the national welfare must be forbidden. We
demand the legal prosecution of all those tendencies in
art and literature which corrupt our national life, and
the suppression of cultural events which violate this
demand.
- We demand absolute religious freedom
for all denominations in the State, provided they do not
threaten its existence nor offend the moral feelings of
the White race. The Party combats the
Jewish-materialistic spirit within and without us, and
is convinced that our nation can achieve permanent
health only from within on the basis of the principle: The
common good before self-interest.
- To put the whole program into effect,
we demand the creation of a strong central national
government for the nation; the unconditional authority
of the political central parliament over the entire
nation and its organizations; and the formation of
committees for the purpose of carrying out the general
legislation passed by the nation and the various
American States.
The leaders of
the movement promise to work ruthlessly-if need be to
sacrifice their very lives-to translate this program
into action.
NATIONAL SOCIALISM
A major problem with all discourse is that people usually harbor their
individualized meanings for the sounds they make. Thus, 'love' can mean a
feeling towards a hot fudge sundae or the urge some men get when someone bends
over in front of them in a shower. I have specific ideas in mind when I use
certain words and often people seem to forget this and peruse the material using
their definitions.
A person is of a certain blood. This, in a mixed sense, is true of his children.
That unit of so-related people is a family. Extensions of this are what we call
kin. The blood related groups enlarge to tribes and tribes compose nations, that
is, a race. Bantus, or Japanese, do not have a lineage remotely equal to mine.
That is why they belong to a different race. The term 'human race' is a misnomer
launched into popular use by those who wish to blur distinctions or seek to
eliminate one race or the other. In fact, the differences between the races are
so pronounced that Blacks, Yellows and Whites technically belong to different
species. (Inter-fertility occurs frequently across the species
boundary.)
We often loose sight of the real world as a result of being intimidated by
'experts' waving their usually useless college degrees (I have 3) in the faces
of those whom wish to intimidate. And never let yourself be out-voted when it
comes to truth. Six million people wearing watches which cannot keep the correct
time are not a source of factual information in this regard. People are
generally intellectually lazy and this makes them prone to accept and believe
utter nonsense.
National Socialism is thus about nations. Those nations can be Black, Yellow,
White or even a sub-race. It's true that many nations have held certain chunks
of geography as their own for centuries but the boundaries set by rivers, oceans
and mountains do not make a nation. It's the nation, in contest with others
usually, which defines those boundaries. America in not a nation. It once was.
Japan is still a nation and I fervently hope it remains so.
In this discussion I shall use the term community to embrace any subset of
nation.
Socialism is much like the word ivory. It once meant something rather specific
but today its mention usually invokes an image of soap. Once an adjunct to
community, socialism today is defined in recent dictionaries as a precursor to
communism. Indeed, many equate the two. I use it in the sense of a
close aggregate of people belonging to the same nation. Community interests are social
interests and any system, or activity so enclosed, constitutes socialism. We are
submerged in Marxian definitions and we should never lose sight of that fact,
ever.
National Socialism is thus concerned with race and the interaction of the
included members. In a more narrow sense, National Socialism not only embraces
the interests of the community, as opposed to 'rugged individualism', but also
implies that quality people make better communities and that quality is far more
desirable than quantity. (Sorry Pope, but you lose on this one.) It further
assumes that the biological quality of its future members can not only be
improved but that it should be a national goal. Furthermore, individual
interests have to take second place relative to community interests.
Here in upside down America, decent people are often subjected to, and are admonished to
tolerate, public nuisances who often are little more than criminal predators.
The 'do your own thing' person who is burdensome to the community should be
disposed of as expeditiously as possible. Vladimir Ilich Lenin soon discarded
his fellow tribe member Karl Heinrich Marx's notion and said that those who do
not work should not eat. I would further extend this by saying that unproductive
people should not be allowed to breed, much less vote or eat.
It is therefore easy to see the reasons why National Socialism invokes such
venomous hatred. "National" is really racism and most assume falsely that
socialism is merely diluted communism. Communism is an idea which is
international in scope. This means that it is really anti-national. Within this
foolish framework, the term National Socialism becomes little other than an
oxymoron.
On a more singular level, personal responsibility to a community, whether family
or race, is an anathema to the free-for-all 'pursuit of happiness' aberration
which has infected and crippled most American minds. "I should be allowed to
bang on my drums at 3 A.M. in the morning and if you are annoyed, then you
should move somewhere else." A healthy community would confiscate the offender's
drums and if he showed up with another set, promptly run him out of town.
An efficient community would insure that he never saw another sunrise.
As Eric Thomson pointed out, National Socialism is really Natural Socialism.
Nowhere in Nature do we find the strong being sacrificed in order to preserve
the useless. Whatever we preserve for the present will become our future.
They breed. We feed.
Citizenship, that is, a formal recognition that you are a member of a racial
community should not be a birthright. It is something which should be earned.
One must demonstrate a potential for enhancing the welfare of his community --
by engaging in useful community service for a protracted period -- and a
reasonable prospect that his usefulness will continue.
Race-mixing is detrimental to everything National Socialism stands for.
Race-mixing is detrimental to the continuation of those attributes contained in
the natural order of things. A mulatto, for example is a very poor Black and he
is equally a very poor White. Although slightly more intelligent than the Black,
as far as test scores seem to indicate, he is utterly inferior to the Black in
problem solving.
A great concern of the voting nitwits is 'health care' which is really a
misnomer for what healthy man needs care? It really is sickness care and it's no
coincidence that over 50 percent of our population is ill from one thing or the
other. If they haven't serious problems then they are plagued with poor
eyesight, toenail fungus, yeast infections, allergies, and anal
pruritus.
If our present population had to run the 'gauntlet' of life which was present only 100
years ago, 50 percent of them wouldn't be alive today. We preserve the weak and
the health problems, and other social ills, multiply -- all in the name of
humanity or some Mideastern religion.
Sick people envy the healthy. The ugly envy the beautiful. The stupid envy the
intelligent. Fermenting envy breeds resentment and ultimately hate. Communism,
whether of the Russian or American variety, creates hatred for that which is
perceived to be superior. (The alliance during WW II was more than a mutual
convenience.) Since National Socialism is directed towards the goal of
improvement of the continued generations, it is not hard to understand
why it is so hated. One National Socialist has at least a thousand enemies.
We are living in an age where the blood of the Golden Goose is being demanded by
those weary of rolling the Golden Eggs which they could never, ever create. If
that protoplasmic pottage known as "mankind" ever achieves its goal of universal
flotsam, then Nature will still have the last say. One can definitely count on
those little bacteria to even the books.
By: Robert Frenz, 26 May 1999
The life of a race is in the wombs of its women. Yet under the existing media, religions and governments, the last White women are being induced to mate with non-Whites wholesale, If whites do not immediately establish an exclusive White nation, then the beauty of White Aryan woman will soon cease to exist on earth forever.
We are taught to dread the extinction of spotted owls, so why is it a hate crime to love and preserve one's race?
"If a racial entity
is being led toward its doom by means of governmental power,
then the rebellion of every member of such a people is not
only a right, but a duty." - Adolf Hitler
